Legal Opinion

Mayo S. Levenson v. Peter Mills, United States Attorney, Movant

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 24, 1961No. 5810PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOODBURY, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from an order entered after full hearing disbarring the appellant from practicing in the United States District Court for the District of Maine and striking his name from the roll of attorneys permitted to practice in that court.

The procedures adopted by the court below were fully agreed to in advance by counsel on both sides. There is no need to review those procedures here. It will be enough to say that the appellant was given ample notice of the charges laid against him and afforded every opportunity for explanation and defense. The procedures…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Randall v. BrighamSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Sacher v. Association of Bar of City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Dwyer v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re McBrideDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. The Standing Committee on Discipline of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California v. John M. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Delfin Ramos Colon v. United States Attorney for the District of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  4. In Re DerryberryUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  5. In Re BrownDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API