Legal Opinion

City of Durham v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 4, 1923PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlaeK, C. J.

The refusal by the court of the motion to continue the hearing and transfer the case to the civil issue docket of the Superior Court for trial by jury was not erroneous, for no issues of fact are raised by the answer. The defendants rely upon C. S., 868, but the relief sought by the plaintiffs is not for the enforcement of a money demand, and that section authorizes the summons to be returnable before the judge at chambers not less than ten days after service of summons in the complaint, “at which time the court, except for good cause shown, should hear and determine the action both as to law…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. SHERLOCK v. Alling, AdmInistratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of GoldsboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Plumley v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Erie Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. City of Raleigh v. MorandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. City of Winston-Salem v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Better Home Furniture Co. of Winston-Salem v. BaronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. In the Matter of Assessment Against R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API