Santacruz v. State

QUINN, Justice.

Javier Ramirez Santaeruz appeals his conviction for possessing a controlled substance. His three points of error involve whether 1) the trial court erred in refusing to grant him a new trial because the jurors purportedly received evidence after retiring to deliberate over punishment and misconducted themselves and 2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction. We affirm.

Points of Error One and Two

Since points one and two involve the court’s refusal to grant a new trial, they will be considered together. According to appellant, he was entitled to new trial because…