Legal Opinion

State v. Meyer

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 12, 1978No. T.C. 1541, C.A. 8212 and S.C. 25652PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

Defendant was charged by information with violating ORS 162.185(1)(b), "Supplying Contraband.” The state appealed from an order sustaining defendant’s demurrer to the information. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for trial, State v. Meyer, 31 Or App 103, 569 P2d 708 (1977). Defendant’s petition for review 1 was allowed to determine the proper construction of this statutory provision and its companion, ORS 162.135(1).

The information read as follows:

"The undersigned District Attorney for the above county hereby files this information against said defendant and charges defendant with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleischhauer v. BILSTAD, GRAY ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. SotoCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1974
  3. State v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  5. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Baines v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR PIMA COUNTYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. State v. FranklinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API