Legal Opinion

Ruva v. Mente

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1991No. 70640PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

The plaintiffs, Richard and Brenda Ruva, filed a seven-count complaint in the circuit court of Putnam County, seeking to rescind an assignment instrument they had entered into with the defendants, Robert, Charlene and Rena Mente. Count I of the complaint, the only count at issue on appeal, alleged that the assignment could be rescinded because it did not contain a warranty or a certificate of compliance as required by section 2 of the Dwelling Unit Installment Contract Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 29, par. 8.22) (the Act). Plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment asking the trial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. SteppanIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Niven v. SiqueiraIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HaywoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Collins Co. v. Carboline Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Shay v. PenroseIllinois Supreme Court · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. SheehanIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State Farm General Insurance v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Levy v. Markal Sales Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Lindholm v. HoltzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. In the Matter of Lefkas General Partners, Nos. 1017, 1018, & 1020, Debtors. Appeal of O'Brien & Assoc., IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API