Catty v. Brockelbank
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Chief Justice.
This matter arises out of a discovery proceeding in aid of execution. The only question involved is whether, under our statute — B. S. 2 :26-153 — a judgment creditor in a discovery proceeding is privileged to require a witness, under process to appear and testify, to bring a specified document or agreement germane to the issue, which shows that certain moneys are due the judgment debtors from given persons. The statute in question reads as follows: 2:26-153 — “In proceedings for discovery in aid of execution, witnesses may be required to appear and testify concerning…
2Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pollard v. Criminal Ct. of Marion Cty.Indiana Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re SapersteinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- In Re State of California for the County of Los AngelesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- State Ex Rel. Rowland Group, Inc. v. KoehrSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- Application of a Grand Jury of the St. of NyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.