Legal Opinion

Weir Plow Co. v. Armentrout, Fraser & Chew

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 5, 1894No. 1443PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEAD, Associate Justice.

— A. Armentrout and A. B. Fraser composed the firm of Armentrout & Fraser, doing business in the city of Fort Worth, and A. Armentrout, A. B. Fraser, and W. A. Chew composed the firm of Armentrout, Fraser & Chew, doing business in the city of Vernon.

On the 18th day of December, 1889, Armentrout & Fraser executed the following instrument, which was duly ácknowledged and recorded, both in Tarrant and Wilbarger Counties:

“State oe Texas, )
“County of Tarrant, j
“Know all men by these presents, that we, A. Armentrout and A. B. Fraser, of said county and State, composing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schneider & Davis v. Ferguson & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Peveler v. PevelerTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Roby & Nichols v. Meyer & BulteTexas Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morriss v. KnepperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Rothschild Bros. Hat Co. v. LotiefCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Brady-Neely Grocer Co. v. De FoeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API