Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Empire City Subway Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 14, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

This proceeding was instituted by reason of the commissioner of water supply, gas and electricity having fixed a schedule or scale of rents for the use of the electrical subways, owned by the Empire City Subway Company, and rented to various telegraph, telephone and electric light companies, to carry their low tension lines and conductors.

The history and legislation relating to these subways is stated in the opinion in Matter of City of New York v. Prendergast (202 App. Div. 308), decided herewith, to the time when the low tension system of subways was conveyed by the Consolidated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Holmes Electric Protective Co. v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. City of New York v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alesi v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  2. City of New York v. New York Water Service Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API