Legal Opinion
Glacier General Assurance Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 19, 1985No. Civ. A. 83-1703PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
At issue before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment is a dispute between two insurance carriers over which of the two companies shall ultimately bear the expense of the settlement of a malpractice claim against a podiatrist, Dr. Love, who was insured by the two companies during consecutive time periods. Counsel have done an excellent job of briefing and arguing the case, and the Court has reviewed the extensive filings and underlying documentation including the depositions of the parties’ expert witnesses. A detailed examination of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Woodrich Construction Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Vigilant Insurance v. Employers Insurance of WausauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Casualty Indemnity Exchange Insurance v. Liberty National Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1995
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Children's Hospital National Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- Fiscus Motor Freight, Inc. v. Universal Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.