Legal Opinion

Heard v. United States Social Security Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 15, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-0230PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge

The plaintiffs, Tina Heard, Pearline Snow, and Carolyn Graham, filed this putative class action against the defendants — the United States Social Security Administration (“SSA”), the United States Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”), and the District of Columbia (“District”)— challenging the SSA’s referral of debts to Treasury for tax refund offsets, and Treasury’s and the District’s subsequent actions in effectuating the offsets. Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶ 1. Currently pending before the Court is the Federal Defendants’ Motion…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Passut v. DevosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
  2. Randhawa v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API