Legal Opinion

Bond v. DeWitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 14, 1954No. Civ. 4902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

There is some confusion whether the complaint states a cause of action for breach of an oral agreement or whether it states a cause of action for damages for fraud. Plaintiff labels it “Complaint for Fraud” and alleges that defendants A. H. DeWitt and Katherine DeWitt, doing business as Creamers Dairy and Central Valley Creamery, entered into an oral agreement whereby defendants agreed to pay plaintiff a monthly salary equal to the union salary scale prevailing in Fresno County for butter pasteurizers so long as plaintiff would be employed by defendants, and in addition defendants agreed to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Shapiro v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. Williams v. San Francisco & Northwestern Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Haas v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Martin v. SutterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tavaglione v. BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Textron Financial Corp. v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Babcock v. OmanskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Tavaglione v. BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API