Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Hull

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1942No. Criminal No. 928PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, C. J.

L. L. Hull, defendant, was informed against by the county attorney of Maricopa County for the crime of receiving stolen goods. He was tried before a jury which found him guilty, and he was duly sentenced to serve a term in the state prison. Thereafter this appeal was taken.

There are six assignments of error, some which contain more than one subdivision, but they may be summed up under three heads: (a) That the evidence did not sustain the verdict; (b) that certain exhibits were improperly admitted in evidence; and (c) that due to the misconduct of the county attorney the defendant did not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wertheimer & Goldberg v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Vacalis v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Vedin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. State v. StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. State v. ZemanUtah Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. GoodyearArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State v. TellezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  3. State v. VitaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  4. State v. GainesArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API