Legal Opinion

Grant v. Marshall

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 28, 1923PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

charged the jury. In addition to the usual charge on the law of negligence, contributory negligence and negligence per se, where a public highway is used in a manner prohibited by statute or city ordinance, he also gave the following instructions:

Section 18 of the Ordinances of the City of Wilmington provides:

• "The operator or driver of a vehicle shall have the right of way over the operator or driver of a vehicle which is approaching from the left on an inter-*241seating street or roadway, and shall give the right of way to an operator or driver of a vehicle approaching from the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. BarnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
  2. Glatz v. Kroeger Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Golden Eagle Dry Goods Co. v. MockbeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Casto v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Pederson v. O'RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Lachance, Admr. v. MyersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Gendron v. GliddenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API