Legal Opinion

Antaya v. Majett

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.

The plaintiff had retained an attorney on a contingency basis to prosecute a personal injury action. The attorney proceeded to represent plaintiff, to institute the suit and to engage in the usual procedures preliminary to trial. In due time, a disagreement arose between client and attorney, the nature of which is presently immaterial. The plaintiff moves before me to substitute attorneys, to direct the present attorney to deliver the papers in the matter to the prospective attorney, and to fix the outgoing attorney’s fee.

As the outgoing attorney properly states in his answering affidavit, 1…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re SebringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  2. Goldman v. Rafel Estates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Matarrese v. WilsonNew York Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Matter of Bailey v. RutherfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gary v. CohenNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gonzales v. HegnerNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Miller v. PaulAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jose R. RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  5. Miller v. PaulAlaska Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API