Legal Opinion

United States v. James S. Reiff

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided March 1, 1971No. 18148_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Defendant was charged in an information with a violation of Title 21, U.S.C.A. § 331(q)(4) for failure to keep a complete and accurate record of and with respect to certain depressant and stimulant drugs. 1 He was represented at all times by competent privately employed counsel. He properly waived his right to trial by jury.

Prior to trial, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Title 18 U.S.C.A., defendant moved to dismiss the action upon the general ground that his prosecution under section 331(q)(4) was a denial of his Fifth Amendment…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Grosso v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Haynes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DonnellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. United States v. Willie Alro KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
  3. Burden of Proof in Drug Offenses, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1975
  4. In re Grand Jury InvestigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. United States v. Willie Alro KellyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API