Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Lewter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 17, 1998No. 1961775PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The controversy underlying this certiorari review arose when Chris Myers Pontiac-GMC, Inc., installed a new engine in a van owned by Fred Lewter and his wife Linda Lewter and the Lewters refused to pay for it, asserting that they had not authorized Myers Pontiac to make that repair. Because the repair had not been paid for, Myers Pontiac retained possession of the van; it held the van until the Lewters filed an action against Myers Pontiac, alleging conversion, and obtained a writ of seizure. Myers Pontiac counterclaimed, alleging fraud and requesting compensation under the theories of open…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Hartford Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Bic Corp. v. BeanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. McCain v. Redman Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Sexton v. PrisockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  5. Chris Myers Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. LewterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. LLOYD NOLAND FOUNDATION v. HealthSouth Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. McDaniel v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., 2100622 (ala.civ.app. 10-28-2011)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  3. Ex Parte Scannelly, 1100226 (Ala. 6-30-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Chris Myers Pontiac-GMC, Inc. v. LewterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  5. Chancellor v. StacyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API