Sexton v. Prisock
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
Perry Sexton and his wife Deborah appeal the summary judgment granted in favor of Walter Prisock.1 We affirm.
Perry was an employee of the City of Satsuma, Alabama. He sued his two co-workers, Claude Weaver and Marvin Barlow, and his supervisor, Walter Prisock, for injuries he incurred during the course of his employment, which consisted of cleaning out ditches, cutting trees, hauling dirt, running a back hoe, filling holes, and a number of other things.2 Summary judgment was granted in favor of Weaver and Prisock, and that judgment was made final pursuant to Rule 54 (b), Ala.R.Civ.P. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tice v. TiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Crawford Johnson & Co. v. DuffnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
- Owens v. National SEC. of Alabama, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Shaw v. City of LipscombSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
- Hand v. ButtsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- King Mines Resort, Inc. v. MALACHI M. & MINERALS, INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Ex Parte JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Cannon v. State FarmSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte DeramusSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Green v. City of MontgomeryCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.