Legal Opinion
National City Bank v. Schinasi
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 20, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The plaintiff moves for summary judgment (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). While there is no limitation on the power of the court to grant such a motion at any stage of the proceedings (Ecker v. Muzysh, 259 App. Div. 206), it is worthy of note that an application by the plaintiff for this relief was, as long ago as June, 1952, denied without prejudice to renewal. Instead of moving promptly or proceeding to trial, the plaintiff waited for more than seven years and has now renewed its motion — with no suggestion given as to any reason for the delay.'
The action is upon an installment note made by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Curry v. MacKenzieNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Lachs v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Kenyon v. Knights Templar & Masonic Mutual Aid Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Wilson v. . FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Hill v. . BeebeNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Janos v. PeckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- MSF Holding Ltd. v. Fiduciary Trust Co. InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Handelman v. M. E. OlenNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Red Apple Supermarkets, Inc. v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. TeplitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967