Legal Opinion

Salt Lake County v. Murray City Redevelopment

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1979No. 15755PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

This appeal arose from an action challenging the validity of a redevelopment plan (the “Plan”) adopted by Defendant Murray City. Plaintiff appeals from two summary judgments granted in favor of defendants. The first one upheld the constitutionality of the Utah Neighborhood Development Act, (the “Act”), Utah Code Annotated (1953), as amended, Sec. 11-19-1 et seq., 1 and the second one upheld the validity of the ordinance enacted by Defendant Murray City (the “City”) to implement its redevelopment plan and agency.

On June 1, 1976, the Murray City Commission adopted a preliminary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Tribe v. Salt Lake City CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Town of Perry v. ThomasUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. In Re Phillip's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  5. State v. Mayor of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Marion Energy, Inc. v. KFJ Ranch PartnershipUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  2. City of West Jordan v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Advisory Opinion on Constitutionality of 1986 Pa 281Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Garfield CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Johnson v. Redevelopment Agency of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API