Legal Opinion

Love v. Hall

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1881No. 9500PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

Suit by the appellee, against the appellants, to foreclose a mortgage. There were five defendants, three of whom answered. Samuel Love was one of those who answered. The other two defendants were defaulted - The cause having been set for trial on a particular day, and1 the day having arrived, those having answered not appearing, the court proceeded to the trial of the issues joined, without a jury, and found for the plaintiff, and assessed her damages as well against those who had pleaded as those who had made default, and rendered the proper judgment. Afterward, Samuel Love moved to set…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Willets v. RidgwayIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Madison & Indianapolis Railroad v. WhiteneckIndiana Supreme Court · 1856
  3. Sloan v. WittbankIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Carver v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Terrell v. State ex rel. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Coleman v. FloydIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Indiana State Board of Medical Registration & Examination v. PickardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Clodfelder v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  4. McArthur v. LefflerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Firestone v. FirestoneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API