Legal Opinion

Gorham v. Gorham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, Alonzo Gorham, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the Albany Special Term and entered in the office of the cleric of the county of Albany on the 27th day of May, 1898, denying the defendant’s motion to confirm the report of a referee appointed in an action for an absolute divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Landon, J.:

The defendant by his answer, besides denying his own guilt, charged the plaintiff with guilt, and thereupon prayed for judgment for an absolute divorce in his own behalf. The referee appointed to hear and determine the issues reported against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendant, and that he was entitled to a judgment of divorce. The Special Term denied the motion of' the defendant to confirm the report and for judgment-, but did not direct judgment in favor of either party. Ho opinion was written, but we infer from an inspection of the case that the denial was based upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moller v. . MollerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Ferguson v. FergusonNew York Court of Chancery · 1846
  3. AnonymousThe Superior Court of New York City · 1877
  4. Tugwell v. BussingNew York Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Dimmers v. ArmitageAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perkins v. PerkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Goldner v. GoldnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. Goldie v. GoldieNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Bauer v. BauerNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Enders v. EndersNew York Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API