Legal Opinion

CB3 Enterprises LLC v. Damas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2013No. WD 75670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN.

CB3 Enterprises, LLC (“CB3 Enterprises”) appeals from the trial court’s entry of judgment pursuant to a jury verdict in favor of Nage Damas (“Damas”) on his counterclaim for indemnification. CB3 Enterprises argues that the trial court erred in denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict because Da-mas did not, and could not, based on CB3 Enterprises’ governing documents, establish a prima facie case for indemnification. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

CB3 Enterprises is a Missouri limited liability company that was formed in 1996 for the express purpose of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dunn Industrial Group, Inc. v. City of Sugar CreekSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. Wildflower Community Ass'n v. RinderknechtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Executive Board of the Missouri Baptist Convention v. Windermere Baptist Conference CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Thiemann v. Columbia Public School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Bailey v. Hawthorn BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leslie Riggs v. State of Missouri Department of Social ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. McGuire v. LindsayMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Power Investments, LLC v. Cardinals Preferred, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
  4. STEVEN CHADWICK v. ROBERT HUNTOON and GEORGE SWEARENGINMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API