Legal Opinion
Wallace v. Southern Pac. Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 12, 1951No. 29015PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODMAN, District Judge.
On the merits, the evidence does not sustain plaintiff’s allegation that his discharge by defendant was a breach of the agreement delineating the terms of his employment. To the contrary, I find the evidence to he persuasive that the discharge of plaintiff was proper. Furthermore, as in Buberl v. Southern Pac. Co., D.C., 94 F.Supp'. 11, plaintiff not only failed to pursue the remedies provided by the contract governing his employment, but he had already been compensated in Wallace v. Southern Pac. Co., No. 27184, 1 for the loss of earnings he seeks to recover in this…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Scarano v. Central R. Co. Of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
- Cone v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
- Karcz v. Luther Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Barker v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- Ezra A. Jones v. Central of Georgia Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.