Legal Opinion
In re Hayevsky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 18, 2003PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a turnover proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law § 81.44, (1) Anna Boychuk and Vera Korsun appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Taylor, J.), entered October 1, 2001, as, after a hearing, directed them to deliver all proceeds of a certain bank account to the petitioner Fran Peterson, and (2) Anna Boychuk, Vera Korsun, and their attorneys Jerome R. Halperin and the Halperin Law Firm, LLP, appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court, dated December 5, 2001, as granted the court examiner’s motion to modify the order entered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re AhoNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Hooper Associates Ltd. v. AGS Computers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Mighty Midgets, Inc. v. Centennial InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v. LezakNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Estate of FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re Ernestine R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hall Dickler Kent Goldstein & Wood, LLP v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- DiMaggio v. DiMaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005