Legal Opinion

Hopson v. Smyth

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 14, 1950No. 6084PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal in a habeas corpus case. The appellant is held in custody under the judgment of a Virginia state court; and it appears not only that there is no merit in his petition but also that he has not exhausted his remedies under state law. The order of the lower court would, therefore, he affirmed if the appeal were properly before us. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587; Washington v. Smyth, 4 Cir., 167 F.2d 658. It is not properly before us, however, because not supported by a certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, and must accordingly be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Bernard v. BradyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
  3. Washington v. SmythCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
  2. Lyle v. Eidson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API