Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Rutgers
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 24, 1987PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
215 N.J. Super. 333 (1987)
521 A.2d 1315
RUTH F. DIXON, RESPONDENT,
v.
RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY; EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN, PRESIDENT; RUSSELL J. FAIRBANKS, PROVOST; WALTER J. GORDON, DEAN, APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 22, 1986.
Decided February 24, 1987.
Before Judges PETRELLA, GAYNOR and SCALERA.
Aron M. Schwartz argued the cause for appellant (Vogel, Chait, Kimmel, Schwartz & Collins, Aron M. Schwartz on the brief).
Nancy Kaplen Miller, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Trammel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Peper v. Princeton University Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dixon v. Rutgers, the State University of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- In Re Grand Jury SubpoenaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Reyes v. Meadowlands Hosp. Med. Ctr.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- In re Suffolk County Ethics CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.