Bridge v. Invest America, Inc.
District Court, D. Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LAGUEUX, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motion of defendants Gary C. Ringen (“Ringen”) and Ringen Financial Corporation (“RFC”) to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 1 Plaintiffs contend that this Court has personal jurisdiction over Ringen because service of process was authorized by section 1965(b) of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”). 18 U.S.C. § 1965(b). Alternatively, plaintiffs argue that jurisdiction exists because service of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dennis T. Serras, Michael C. Gibbons, and Dieter J. Boehm v. First Tennessee Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Stafford v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dooley v. United Technologies Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
- KVH Industries, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1992
- Multi-Media International, LLC v. Promag Retail Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- BankAtlantic v. Coast to Coast Contractors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.