Legal Opinion

Caspary v. Carter

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts

Decided December 14, 1897No. 551PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This is a motion, based on section 724 of the Revised Statutes, for production in a common-law suit. It prays as follows:

“Now, the plaintiff moves that the defendants be ordered to produce forthwith, before a day certain, for the inspection of the plaintiff and his attorneys, and to allow the plaintiff and his attorneys to inspect, each and all of *417the books and documents hereinafter mentioned, and that the defendants, upon failure to comply with said order, suffer judgment by default, viz.: All the books of the concern formerly doing business under the name and style of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Boston v. State Nat. Bank of BostonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1868
  2. Iasigi v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1853
  3. National Cash-Register Co. v. LelandU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1896
  4. Kirkpatrick v. Pope Manuf'g Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mobile Gas Co. v. PattersonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1923
  2. Victor G. Bloede Co. of Baltimore City v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1899
  3. Mobile Gas Co. v. PattersonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1923
  4. Rollman Mfg. Co. v. Universal Hardware WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1914
  5. Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society v. GomezDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API