Legal Opinion

Van De Grift v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 2013No. 20110994PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Associate Chief Justice NEHRING,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 Appellants, who were defrauded by an individual on parole from a Utah prison, appeal the district court's determination that the Governmental Immunity Act renders the State immune from Appellants' claims alleging negligent supervision of the parolee. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 Appellants filed a complaint in district court alleging that "[the multi-state Madison Group [Ponzi] scheme, which defrauded Plaintiffs of over $27,000,000 ..., was masterminded by Utah [convict] and parolee Richard Higgins while he was on parole...." Mr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hall v. Utah State Department of CorrectionsUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ledfors v. Emery County School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Bennett v. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonoughUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. NELSON BY AND THROUGH STUCKMAN v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Moss v. Parr Waddoups Brown Gee & LovelessUtah Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kerr v. City of Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Graves v. Utah County GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  3. ARMENTA v. UNIFIED FIREUtah Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Miller v. West Valley CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  5. Mariani v. Driver License DivisionUtah Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API