Legal Opinion

Deming v. The Rapid Transit

District Court, D. Washington

Decided October 3, 1892No. 414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

In Admiralty. Libel in rem by Leming, Burntrager, and others against the steamer Rapid Transit, Elmer E. Caine, claimant.

1Opinion of the Court

Hanford, District Judge.

On the 14th day of August, 1891, the steamer Rapid Transit, with' a cargo consisting principally of lime on board, suffered damage by fire in the liarbor of Seattle, and was, by the fire department of the city, beached and scuttled for the purpose of extinguishing the flames. The sinking of the steamer caused a total destruction of the lime, but that was the only method by which a total loss of the vessel, as well as the cargo, could have been prevented; and it was effective. The libelants owned the lime which was destroyed, and this suit was instituted by them to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butler v. Boston & Savannah Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. The City of NorwichSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. The ScotlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. The Great WesternSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Earle & Stoddart, Inc. v. Ellerman's Wilson Line, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Consumers Import Co. v. Kabushiki Kaisha Kawasaki ZosenjoSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. The StrathdonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1898
  4. The Buckeye StateDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1941
  5. Cronenwett v. Boston & A. Transp. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API