Legal Opinion
Jeremy Rocha v. County of Tulare
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 2015No. 13-17267UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
Jeremy Rocha appeals the dismissal with prejudice of his second amended complaint (“SAC”) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
1.The district court did not err in dismissing Rocha’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims because Rocha failed to allege a violation of his federal constitutional or statutory rights, a necessary predicate for § 1983 liability. See Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 632-33 (9th Cir.1988). Rocha’s generalized allegations regarding the manner of the search are factually insufficient to state a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- William Leer Robert Larry Emerhiser v. Al Murphy Darrell Gardner Arvin AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DeMaria v. Yolo County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Michael Thompson v. Dublin Police Services, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026