Legal Opinion
Moore v. Berryman
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 14, 1932No. 8 Div. 319PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill as originally filed and as amended.
The bill was to restrain the foreclosure of a mortgage, for the redemption of said mortgage on real property before foreclosure, for the elimination of usury alleged to be carried therein on accounting, for the due and proper marshaling of assets between several securities and parties alleged to be interested therein, and the appropriation of payments alleged to have been made on the mortgages.
The allegations are sufficient as a bill for injunction and redemption on the averred facts of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Julian v. WoolbertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
- Security Loan Ass'n v. LakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Carroll v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Ezzell v. First Nat. Bank of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- State Ex Rel. Giblin v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
- Beasley v. RossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Ingram v. People's Finance Thrift Co. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Wesson v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.