Lassiter v. . Lassiter
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Application for alimony pendente lite, in an action pending in the Superior Court of RICHMOND count)’, heard before Philips, Judge, at chambers. There was a judgment allowing alimony, and the defendant .appealed. The facts fully appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtAshe, J.
This was an application for alimony pendente lite in an action brought by the plaintiff against the defendant in the Superior Court of Richmond county, and heard at Chambers by His Honor, Judge Philips.
Upon considering the complaint of the plaintiff and the answer of the defendant, and the affidavits offered by both plaintiff and defendant, His Honor found the following facts:
1. That the plaintiff and defendant were married in or about the year 1852, and they have ten children, the oldest of whom is about thirty years of age, and the youngest about seven years of age.
2. That the defendant has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
- Gordon v. . GordonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. . FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Wolfe v. PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Moore v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Page v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Moody v. . MoodySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.