Legal Opinion

Page v. . Page

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1914PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Harding, J., at September Term, 1914, of Polk.

1Opinion of the CourtClark, C. J.

This is an action for a divorce from bed and board. It was before us, Page v. Page, 161 N. C., 170, upon appeal from a decree granting alimony pendente lite. The defendant excepted to the refusal of the court to dismiss the action upon that opinion. But on reference thereto it will be found that it rested upon the statement that notwithstanding the facts found by the court in that case, the judge had added a finding that he acquitted the defendant of any intended wrong. This Court said: “We do not concur with the court in its conclusion that, assuming the defendant’s testimony to be true, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harris v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. Lassiter v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Page v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Page v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Sanders v. . SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. . EgglestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Brooks v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Joyner v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Jones v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Allen v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API