Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. XO COMMUNICATIONS

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 2009No. 1D08-1153PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

James Mitchell, Claimant, appeals an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying his claims for permanent total and permanent supplemental (PTD) benefits. This is the second time this Claimant has appealed this JCC’s denial of PTD benefits. See Mitchell v. XO Commc’ns, 966 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (Mitchell I). In Mitchell I, we reversed and remanded for additional proceedings because the “JCC’s final order [was] inconsistent in its findings of fact and conclusions of law.... ” Id. at 490. Because the JCC’s order issued after remand contains many of the same internal…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. XO COMMUNICATIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Allen v. Protel, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. Tidwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holland v. CHENEY BROS., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  2. Aguilar v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Garcia v. Fence Masters, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Garcia v. Fence Masters, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API