Holland v. CHENEY BROS., INC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtHawkes, C.J.
Claimant challenges the legal sufficiency of an order of the Judge of Compensation (JCC) that denies temporary partial disability (TPD) benefits. Claimant argues that the order fails to contain sufficient findings of ultimate fact, making meaningful appellate review impossible. Because this issue was not preserved, we affirm.
On appeal, Claimant does not raise a substantive argument as to the JCCs application of section 440.15(4)(a)-(e), Florida Statutes (2007), which establishes the legal standard for an award of TPD benefits. Rather, Claimant argues as the basis for reversal that the JCCs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Trujillo v. Southern Wine & SpiritsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Hamilton v. RL BEST INTERN.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Jellison v. DIXIE SOUTHERN INDUS., INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- Anderson v. WagnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- PENSACOLA BEACH PIER, INC. v. KingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Chiu v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Sierra v. Metropolitan Protective ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Levory W. Hickmon v. Rachel Bushey Reese, P.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
- Transportation Engineering, Inc. v. CruzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.