Legal Opinion

Martin v. Aldermen of Newton

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhittemore, J.

This is the respondents’ appeal 1 from a final judgment that a writ of mandamus issue commanding the respondent members of the board of aldermen of the city of Newton forthwith to reinstate the petitioner in the office of comptroller of accounts of the city.

The respondents had earlier appealed to this court from an order of February 8, 1956, made after trial of the case on evidence, which was entitled “Final Judgment” and was entered as such on the docket. We held as to that appeal, 335 Mass. 362, following Klier v. Building Inspector of Lawrence, 333 Mass. 111, that it did not carry the case…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Carilli v. HerseyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  3. Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Creditors National Clearing HouseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. McKenna v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  5. Bailen v. Board of Assessors of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kropp v. Common CounCilNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Southwick Birds & Animals, Inc. v. County CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  3. Cooney v. Commissioner of the Real Property DepartmentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974
  4. Lawson v. CorneliusNew York Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API