Legal Opinion
Beaupre v. Pierce County
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 2007No. 79976-8PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
166 P.3d 712 (2007)
Curtis A. BEAUPRE, Respondent,
v.
PIERCE COUNTY, Petitioner.
No. 79976-8.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued May 29, 2007.
Decided September 13, 2007.
Daniel Ray Hamilton, Attorney at Law, Deputy Pros. Atny., Tacoma, WA, for Petitioner.
Joseph E. Fischnaller, Attorney at Law, Kirkland, WA, Michael Scott Dutton, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
OWENS, J.
¶ 1 Pierce County appeals a trial court's denial of its motion for summary judgment. Pierce County contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in ruling that the professional rescue doctrine does not…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Scott v. Pacific West Mountain ResortWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Maltman v. SauerWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Farmers Insurance v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Oltman v. Holland America Line USA, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Valerie J. SlotkeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- Spradlin Rock Products, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- SPRADLIN ROCK v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.