Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Jones

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 7, 1890PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Promissory notes. Pleadings. Consideration. Warranty. . Recoupment. Y erdict. Evidence. Eraud. Charge of court. Damages. Sales. Practice. Before Judge Neel. City court of Gartersville. September .adjourned term, 1889. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Simmons, Justice.

Cochran sued Jones on two promissory notes. Jones filed a plea of the'general issue. Also a plea that the consideration of the notes sued on was a certain separating thrashing-machine, which defendant was induced to purchase, and to sign said notes, by the false and fraudulent representations of the plaintiff; that plaintiff represented that the machine was a good one and reasonably suited for thrashing wheat, and that all it needed was some bolts and babbit metal run in the boxes, and that the machine was in every way-first-class and did first-class work, when in fact it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. James v. ElliottSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  2. Terhune v. DeverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Camilla Cotton Oil Company and George M. Perry, Sr. v. Spencer Kellogg and Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  2. Atlanta Tallow Co. v. John W. Eshelman & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  3. National Computing Scale Co. v. EavesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Taylor v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  5. Davis-Pickett Chevrolet, Inc. v. CollierCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API