Shattuck v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 51, Jan. T., 1895, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1894, No. 1289, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for specific performance.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 51, Jan. T., 1895, by defendants, from decree of C. P. No. 2, Phila. Co., March T., 1894, No. 1289, on bill in equity. Bill in equity for specific performance. The case was referred to Rudolph M. Schick, Esq., as referee, who reported as follows: “ The bill "of complaint alleges that, on March 2, 1894, the defendants were the owners in fee of the premises known as Nos. 928, 930 and 932 North Eighth street, and still own the same; that they obtained the same by deed dated August 8, 1893, which deed described each of the three lots separately. The lot No. 928 was described as…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The judgment in this case is affirmed upon the findings of fact and conclusions of law .contained in the report of the learned referee7 in the court below.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Holland v. HayesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Feld v. ShapiroSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Lawver v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Danner v. Gates, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1929