Legal Opinion
CoreStates Bank, N.A. v. Huls America, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 11, 1999No. 97-1784PublishedCited by 188 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Chief Judge.
This appeal by CoreStates Bank, N.A. (“CoreStates”) requires us to consider the putative claim preclusive effect of the Bankruptcy Judge’s denial of CoreStates’s objections to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization plan confirmation. Both CoreStates and appellee Huls America, Inc. (“Huls”) had extended substantial credit to the debtor, United Chemical Technologies, Inc. (“UCT”), a chemical separation science company, to facilitate the purchase by UCT of a manufacturing facility from Huls. They then entered into a Subordination Agreement in order to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by188 opinions
- In Re: Combustion Engineering, Inc. First State Insurance Company Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Gunnells v. Healthplan Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Comcast Cable Communications, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Lafferty v. St. RielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Matrix IV, Inc. v. American Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
183 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.