Legal Opinion

Brock v. Sirmans

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1933No. 6186PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

These suits were brought in a state court in Kentucky on promissory notes executed to plaintiffs in the state of Texas, and made payable ten months after date at a bank in that state. The defendant, being a nonresident of Kentucky, removed the suits to the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, where he filed answers pleading inter alia that the actions were barred by the Texas statute of limitations. To these pleas the plaintiffs filed replies relying, in avoidance thereof, upon an absentee provision in the Texas statute, and alleging that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Richardson v. Washington & Costley Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. L. F. Wilson & Co. v. DaggettTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Snoddy v. CageTexas Supreme Court · 1849

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Le Mieux Bros. v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API