Legal Opinion

Squyres v. Rasmussen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 8, 1927No. 7151PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MeOLENDON, o. j.

Appeal from an order granting a new trial upon motion filed after the term had expired at which final judgment was rendered. Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final judgment,' but merely interlocutory.

“Although the contrary might be inferred from some of the earlier decisions (8 Tex.' 342; 9 Tex. 69; 17 Tex. 114), it must now be regarded as settled that a new trial is never in fact granted after the adjournment of the term of the court at which the judgment is rendered, no matter what ¿re the grounds urged in support…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Overton v. BlumTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Roller v. WooldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Taylor, Knapp & Co. v. ForeTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Lamb-McAshan Co. v. EllisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Owens v. FoleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mercer v. BandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Barton v. Montex CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Hubbard v. TallalTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  4. McCauley v. Northern Texas Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Bray v. First Nat. Bank of MertzonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API