Legal Opinion

Svensson v. Lindgren

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 23, 1914No. Nos. 18,395—(214)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Action in the district court for Ramsey county by the administrator of the estate of John Pearson, deceased, to recover $200 upon a promissory note. The case was tried before Gatlin, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip E. Brown, J.

Action to recover the amount of a promissory note of date March 9, 1910, due November 1, 1910, bearing interest at six per cent per annum, and executed by defendant to plaintiff’s intestate; defense, want of consideration; verdict for defendant. Plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The errors assigned relate solely to admissions and exclusions of evidence and charge.

1. Defendant propounded to his wife, produced by him as a witness and testifying in his behalf, questions seeking to elicit conversations, claimed to have occurred between her and deceased and between the latter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chicago Union Traction Co. v. O'BrienIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People v. AmbachIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Puett v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kellett v. WasnieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Taylor v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  3. Nelson v. FarrishSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Meagher v. FogartySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  5. Pearson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API