Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Joslin
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided February 26, 2008No. C.A. C-07-455PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
BRIAN L. OWSLEY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs action on numerous grounds, including failure to exhaust administrative remedies and lack of personal jurisdiction. (D.E.2). Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition. (D.E.14). For the reasons stated herein, defendants’ motion to dismiss is denied, but defendants Dan Joslin and John Doe are dismissed from this action.
JURISDICTION
The Court has federal question jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Upon consent of the parties, (D.E.10,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Carlson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. DemkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Enplanar, Inc. v. MarshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Eugenio L. Rodriguez v. Mike HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thompson v. FEDERAL PRISONS INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008