Legal Opinion

United States v. Peppa

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 13, 1936No. 12614-YPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

YANKWICH, District Judge.

Clause (1) (A), subdivision (a) of section 1693, title 26 U.S.C.A. denounces as a crime the act of “Every person who simulates or falsely or fraudulently executes or signs any bond, permit, entry, or other document required by the provisions of the internal revenue laws, or by any regulation made in pursuance thereof.” (Italics added.)

The defendant is accused by the grand jury of the crime of simulation and execution of an Internal Revenue Order Form for narcotics. The charging part of the indictment reads: “On or about the 10th day of August, 1934, in the County of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Gooch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. United States v. LacherSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Union Tool Co. v. Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. People v. BrothertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Southern Enterprises v. FosterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API