State v. Harter
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Henry District Court. — Hon. W. S. With-row, Judge. Under an indictment for perjury, defendant was convicted and sentenced, and from the judgment he prosecutes this appeal. —
1Opinion of the Court
McClain, C. J.—
The sole objection to the judgment, urged in various ways is that the indictment charging the defendant with perjury was insufficient in not properly charging the name or authority of the person by. whom the oath was i administered. The allegation was that defendant appeared as a witness on the trial of a criminal prosecution in the district court of Henry county, “ and was then and there duly sworn before the duly authorized clerk of said court.” The provision of the statute (Code, section 5296) is that: “ In an indictment for perjury ... it is sufficient to set forth ... in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Masterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. CaywoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Keator v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1876
- State v. O'HaganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. HiattSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986