Legal Opinion

People v. Rainwater

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 28, 1991No. 5-89-0141PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton

Michael Rainwater’s lawyer left the courthouse, giving the court no place where he could be reached while a jury deliberated Rainwater’s fate on criminal sexual assault charges.

When the jury retired, the court and counsel conferred:

“THE COURT: If you leave?

[COUNSEL]: I will waive my presence during the...[.]

THE COURT: So, we will bring your client back to the courtroom.

[COUNSEL]: Yes, he should be.

THE COURT: If there are any questions by the Jurors to the Court we will convene and by your absence then you would be waiving your presence?

[COUNSEL]:' Okay, yes.

THE COURT: When the verdicts come…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  2. State v. WischhusenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  3. People v. AguilarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  4. People v. AguilarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API