People v. Rainwater
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Howerton
Michael Rainwater’s lawyer left the courthouse, giving the court no place where he could be reached while a jury deliberated Rainwater’s fate on criminal sexual assault charges.
When the jury retired, the court and counsel conferred:
“THE COURT: If you leave?
[COUNSEL]: I will waive my presence during the...[.]
THE COURT: So, we will bring your client back to the courtroom.
[COUNSEL]: Yes, he should be.
THE COURT: If there are any questions by the Jurors to the Court we will convene and by your absence then you would be waiving your presence?
[COUNSEL]:' Okay, yes.
THE COURT: When the verdicts come…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- People v. EnochIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MooreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- State v. WischhusenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- People v. AguilarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
- People v. AguilarAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020