Legal Opinion

State of Oregon v. Goodwin

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1956PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the circuit court, based upon the verdict of a jury, which found him' guilty of the crime of buying and receiving stolen property. The sole assignment of error follows:

“The court erred in not sustaining the objection to the introduction of the recorded confession in evidence for impeachment purposes.”

No evidence was presented indicating that the recorded confession was voluntarily made and, therefore, it was presumably involuntary. State v. Bouse, 199 Or 676, 264 P2d 800. When the recording was offered in the state’s case in chief as a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BouseOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. SweeneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Pierson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. The People v. MaggioIllinois Supreme Court · 1927
  5. People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State v. CraterOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. SpunaugleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API