Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1965PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of assault and robbery while being armed with a dangerous weapon. He has appealed, contending that the trial court committed error in admitting, over his objection, his signed confession.

The state put on its case in chief without identifying or attempting to introduce the confession. Defendant, in presenting his case, testified he had never been at the scene of the crime and was not involved in the robbery. He also introduced testimony of an alibi.

Upon cross examination he was asked if he had not been questioned by police officers. After he admitted that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Mallory v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. BouseOregon Supreme Court · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. BrewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. People v. HarrisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API